RE: Ivy (not EVIE) is really leaving for a bit
September 21, 2013 at 8:44 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2013 at 8:53 pm by Mystical.)
Ivy Wrote:I have so much catching up to do... which thread to read first...
This one was epic.. all of it.
From Drich asking us to let him pray that we get AIDS
(August 26, 2013 at 10:31 pm)Drich Wrote: I am saying if you do not think you would ask God to spare your life when face with a terrible disease like aids, I am asking you to allow me to pray that God strike you down with aids, cancer or whatever it takes for you to beg and or grovel for your life. Why?To simply prove the point that there are no atheist when you are staring down the barrel of eternity. That is how I know those 'elite controllers' were healed. Because I know they prayed. Even the ones who thought they were atheist.
I'm not just talking about " a bad day, week, month, or even year." Again the offer is if you think you can, you will stand firm in your beliefs and not beg for mercy/life just say the word, and I will ask God to infect you with something or place you in a situation where you can find out for yourself.
Not a terrible life. A deadly disease. Or to be put in a life and death situation. There is nothing I am offering to do for you that I have not already prayed for myself. In that, a long time ago I asked God to do whatever it took, even if it meant my life, to help me see and understand Him. I now offer that on your behalf for you. Not as a curse but an opportunity to not only know yourself, but in the journey to get to know God.
For he who cherishes his life above all else will loose it. And he who forsakes his life for Christ will gain eternal life.
Just know I generally get what I pray for.
To Stimbo and I telling him to do it
To Drich calling military service men d-bags and claiming there's no atheists in foxholes
(August 27, 2013 at 12:43 pm)Drich Wrote:(August 27, 2013 at 11:37 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote:
They do not look like they're underfire to me. Or do you not know what a fox hole is? Those guys look like they work 'in the rear with the gear' where people can still afford to deny God. (Note the big High wall behind them and the gate.) Again a base is not a fox hole.
The 'd-bags' are 'd-bags' because they are in a 'safe' place well outside of harms way posing for a picture that implies they are in harms way.
Or this concurrent thread where JohnV and Godschild are reasoning dismemberment, then rape, and child murder into their psyche
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20696-po...#pid503366
(September 5, 2013 at 1:25 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(September 4, 2013 at 1:19 pm)John V Wrote: Think about it. The law has the general principal of eye for eye and tooth for tooth. Since a woman doesn't have balls, this clarifies the punishment for that situation. Ripping out her lady junk would probably be worse than cutting off a hand.
(September 6, 2013 at 9:00 am)John V Wrote:(September 6, 2013 at 7:27 am)Brakeman Wrote: Unless of course his intention was to rape her and force her to submit to his whims for her entire life.We've covered this one before. Some translations do not use "rape." That he seizes her could imply that, but that "they" are discovered implies it's a situation of seduction. In that society men prized virginity in a potential bride. The man in this case was forced to pay the father the bride price. Note that the father was not forced to give up the girl to the man. But, if he chose to, the man was forced to support her for life. The passage is a protection for women, not a punishment of them.
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (NIV)
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels[a] of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
(September 7, 2013 at 10:43 am)Godschild Wrote: Those Christian martyrs were not committing mass murder on the innocent. I'm yet to find an atheist who defends 9/11, that is unless you're the first.
Smile GC
(September 11, 2013 at 12:08 am)missluckie26 Wrote:(September 9, 2013 at 5:35 pm)Godschild Wrote: Oh boy, how ridiculous. Just to show you I'll give the effort, I went and looked up the Hebrew for tore and it does not indicate death, nor does any of the other translations of those verses I reviewed. Now that we have that out of the way let's examine the verses, those boys were not only mocking Elisha but, God as well. We know these boys came from Bethel which at the time was the center of pagan idol worship in Israel the Northern Kingdom. These boys were telling Elisha not to come to Bethel and bring God's word because no one there wanted to hear it. So God punished those boys for their mockery and rejection of His prophet and His word.
.
I too looked up the Hebrew for tore and it indicates to be made into morsels, to be plucked up and torn to pieces.
In any case if you're actually saying what I think you're saying: those boys weren't killed, just mauled so that makes it okay. I'd like to know from where in the text it indicates to you that those children weren't ripped to shreds by two bears.
Or my thread thanking these wonderful theists for concreting my belief that they're psycho, at which point Catfish calls me a cunt for calling him out as a troll so I take the high road and call him a cuntfish.. Apparently not having a valid point whatsoever pissed him off.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20756-po...#pid504669
That was fun.
I'm tired so technically i only made it to the lowlights. Highlights to follow

If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)