(September 25, 2013 at 5:30 pm)Drich Wrote: 4) to show you that you are not in a position to identify evidence when it is presented. For if you can not define what you are looking for, then it stands to reason your not really looking to accept anything.Drich.... Aren't you the one who wants to show us that such entity exists?
We (at least, I) are not looking for that entity you call god. We merely look at everything we can find... and out of all the wonderful things we've seen in this Universe, nothing seems to qualify as what you call god...
Unless we look in the minds of people... But if we look there, we can also find Darth Vader, Harry Potter... I'm sure you've heard it all before...
So, if you want us to acknowledge that such an entity exists, you're the one who has to define it and present it in a way that we can not mistake for "it's all in your head".
Until then, it's all in your head.
