(September 25, 2013 at 5:57 pm)Drich Wrote:yeah.. about that... you're not succeeding.(September 25, 2013 at 5:50 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Drich.... Aren't you the one who wants to show us that such entity exists?No. Not my job. That task is something God the Holy Spirit owns. My job begins and ends with showing you how to obtain a measure of the Holy Spirit.
(September 25, 2013 at 5:57 pm)Drich Wrote:Aye... method X is failing to work on this god of yours...Quote:We (at least, I) are not looking for that entity you call god. We merely look at everything we can find... and out of all the wonderful things we've seen in this Universe, nothing seems to qualify as what you call god...if God is the creator of the natural universe, then everything in creation points to God. Why would God create all of the laws and processes that govern the natural world, just so He can circumvent them each and every time He wants something Done? Does it not stand to reason that if God created X then wouldn't he use X to accomplish what He sets out to do? Why create X if you are going to use process Y? Why not simply create Y to accomplish your goals?
(September 25, 2013 at 5:57 pm)Drich Wrote:Quote:So, if you want us to acknowledge that such an entity exists, you're the one who has to define it and present it in a way that we can not mistake for "it's all in your head".i don't want any of you to do anything that your not already doing, unless your truly want proof of God. If you want Proof of God you must first Humble yourselves before Him, and Ask, Seek, and knock as outlined in Luke 11.
Until then, it's all in your head.
And that method becomes indistinguishable from "it's all in your mind". So it's not a valid method to determine the existence of an entity.
Can you understand this?