As soon as one introduces omni-facets into a being, and then uses (for example) the bible as a reference of behaviour to said being, then you come up against contradiction after contradiction as to the reasoning and behaviour behind said actions.
I mean, just taking one idea, that an omni-faceted being would 'create' us in the first place makes no sense. Why would an omni-faceted being 'want' at all?
The only way out of this is to say that 'one cannot know the mind of [insert omni-faceted being]'. But even then you get into trouble because how does one know that if you can't know it? It's another contradiction.
If I were a theist, I would avoid any reference to an omni-faceted being. I have no idea what I'd say instead, but luckily for me I have no belief in any of this kind of thing so it doesn't matter. It's not my problem to resolve
I mean, just taking one idea, that an omni-faceted being would 'create' us in the first place makes no sense. Why would an omni-faceted being 'want' at all?
The only way out of this is to say that 'one cannot know the mind of [insert omni-faceted being]'. But even then you get into trouble because how does one know that if you can't know it? It's another contradiction.
If I were a theist, I would avoid any reference to an omni-faceted being. I have no idea what I'd say instead, but luckily for me I have no belief in any of this kind of thing so it doesn't matter. It's not my problem to resolve
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
