Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
I have no patience for someone who, when told that their sources are riddled with bias, fallacies and logical errors, recasts the entire conversation into an accusation that we're not willing to consider an opposing view.
I went to your links, dude. Nothing there was particularly strong. One of them hard locked my computer twice, in fact, but I kept looking.
And I went further. I looked into the organization making the claims, and let me tell you, that's something I shouldn't really have to do, but when it comes to creationist sources we have to because creationists have a proven history of lying and distorting facts to fit their view. Lo and behold, this was true here. And yet somehow, my continued research denotes a lack of willingness to listen.
And through all of this, your one response was that you prefer to believe your unevidenced god claim over anyone else's. You started out the thread by saying you weren't interested in a debate, and yet we aren't willing to listen?
Enjoy your time in the echo chamber, then. When you've encountered the little splinter of intellectual honesty you have left, and nurtured it into a respect for scientific rigor and peer review, come back and see us. Until then, why should we bother dealing with an individual who is so gleefully ready to swallow any old shit so long as it confirms mummy and daddy's indoctrination?
I have no patience for someone who, when told that their sources are riddled with bias, fallacies and logical errors, recasts the entire conversation into an accusation that we're not willing to consider an opposing view.
I went to your links, dude. Nothing there was particularly strong. One of them hard locked my computer twice, in fact, but I kept looking.
And I went further. I looked into the organization making the claims, and let me tell you, that's something I shouldn't really have to do, but when it comes to creationist sources we have to because creationists have a proven history of lying and distorting facts to fit their view. Lo and behold, this was true here. And yet somehow, my continued research denotes a lack of willingness to listen.
And through all of this, your one response was that you prefer to believe your unevidenced god claim over anyone else's. You started out the thread by saying you weren't interested in a debate, and yet we aren't willing to listen?
Enjoy your time in the echo chamber, then. When you've encountered the little splinter of intellectual honesty you have left, and nurtured it into a respect for scientific rigor and peer review, come back and see us. Until then, why should we bother dealing with an individual who is so gleefully ready to swallow any old shit so long as it confirms mummy and daddy's indoctrination?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!