The REAL challenge

[Foxaèr]

If any theist can provide me with verifiable evidence for the existence of god, the type of evidence that can withstands scrutiny of the scientific method, I would gladly concede that the deity's existence is real.

Disclaimer: A/S/K/ing me to forego with reason and logic to believe with faith as a child would in fairies is not evidence of anything except your ignorance and gullibility. Also, the bible is not evidence of god's existence any more than a spider-man comic is evidence of spider-man's existence.

[Minimalist]

[fr0d0]

Dumbest thread ever award

[robvalue]

I actually do have proof. I probably should have mentioned that. But I don't want this to be proved, so I am shredding it all right now. Sorry about that.

[downbeatplumb]

There are theists who reject the notion that there could be any proof of god.
This is convenient for this particular brand of theist who justify their beliefs this way. It means that they never have to provide evidence for what they believe and so can believe what they like and say "foolish atheists requiring evidence and reason for their beliefs" and still feel superior despite having no reason to.

What if there were evidence for god, it was true and it was real!
These theists would have to reject this in order to stay faithful to their position!

That is the position they have put themselves in.

[robvalue]

Yep, ironically it would be them shredding the evidence they have been searching so hard for because they find god is actually a guy called Keith working at Universes4U.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

What ABOUT Spiderman????

Boru

[fr0d0]

There are theists who reject the notion that there could be any proof of god.
This is convenient for this particular brand of theist who justify their beliefs this way. It means that they never have to provide evidence for what they believe and so can believe what they like and say "foolish atheists requiring evidence and reason for their beliefs" and still feel superior despite having no reason to.

What if there were evidence for god, it was true and it was real!
These theists would have to reject this in order to stay faithful to their position!

That is the position they have put themselves in.

Quite the opposite.

Physical evidence of the non physical always loses to the logic hammer. Banging your head against the wall as a theist or an atheist isn't going to change that. You might become more stupid tho.

The logic still has to be defended. The evidence play is a cop out. No thinking required once you state that a chair is a chair is a chair.

[downbeatplumb]

There are theists who reject the notion that there could be any proof of god.
This is convenient for this particular brand of theist who justify their beliefs this way. It means that they never have to provide evidence for what they believe and so can believe what they like and say "foolish atheists requiring evidence and reason for their beliefs" and still feel superior despite having no reason to.

What if there were evidence for god, it was true and it was real!
These theists would have to reject this in order to stay faithful to their position!

That is the position they have put themselves in.

Quite the opposite.

Physical evidence of the non physical always loses to the logic hammer.

Non-physical things are things like ideas they don't really have an existence other than in the mind.

Saying god is non-physical is exactly the same as saying he isn't real.

Banging your head against the wall as a theist or an atheist isn't going to change that. You might become more stupid tho.

The logic still has to be defended. The evidence play is a cop out. No thinking required once you state that a chair is a chair is a chair.

I have no idea what you mean here.

[Aoi Magi]

You are asking for verifiable proof from theists, that too in an atheist forum? Well, good luck, I guess.