I'm a YEC. Challenge me.

[John V]

Yes, that's called an error bar: nobody is claiming that these dating methods are perfectly accurate, but you can see that they group around the same date range.

No, not all of them.

The ones that go noticeably under that are K-Ar readings, which aren't accurate because they record the last heating and impact event of the rocks- taken from a body that takes regular meteorite hits- rather than the actual age of the rock.

As I showed, in my link to you before.

you gave a link, but you didn't show what you claim. Here's what your link says:
Because of the severe impact history of the early Moon and the consequent heating and metamorphism of lunar samples, the conventional K-Ar method is not particularly useful in the study of lunar rock formation because it tends to date the latest heating and impact events rather than original rock ages.

It doesn't say regular meteor hits, it says the impacts occurred to "the early moon," which would not cause argon dating to be much more recent than other methods.

---

But not when evaluating the anonymous writers of your bible apparently.

It ain't called Anonymous's Epistle to the Galatians!