I'm a YEC. Challenge me.

[John V]

What do you think early means, in terms of a celestial body? Like a week or two?

No, but some of the differences are two billion years. I don't consider that early on something that's 4.5 billion years old.

Example. Please note, down in the section about the age of the moon, where Venus' "relatively recent" timescale is five hundred million years.

First, sure, I'd give you 450 million as "early", as that's about 10% of total life.

Second, notice what the link says by the picture of lunar craters: "The large number of craters in this region indicates that this part of the Moon is quite ancient."

---

Because you said you were incapable of comprehending lead-loss

Lead-loss on the moon. But again, if you're correct that heating will reset any of those methods to zero, then you still have the problem of differing ages. You're actually hurting the cause with this argument, and it goes against the link which Exlax provided. I'm not saying that talkorigin's word is gold, but I'll take it over some guy on the internet.