RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 6, 2013 at 3:05 am
(October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 5, 2013 at 4:26 pm)pocaracas Wrote: LOL.
READ!
Just one example, Lucy.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10....21183/pdf
and where they found her:
Thank you for the picture.
Tuff 8: 3.46 +- 0.12 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.56 +- 0.2 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.78 +- 0.04 Ma
So they could be
Tuff 8: 3.58 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.36 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.74 Ma
So Tuff 7 could be younger than the layer above.
So they could be out of order.
That picture proved the topic's post.
Well astonishingly Gracie this argument is even weaker than your other ones - and that is really saying something.
What circumstances do you perceive that would mean we would use the maximum error level in one direction for a level and the maximum error level in the opposite direction for the subsequent level?
To put the above in a more practical setting.
Do you think it would be possible for a higher level to be older than a lower one (excluding volcanic / seismic disturbance).
Do you think God made the older higher level hover - waiting for the newer, younger level?