RE: "Old" atheism, "New"atheism, atheism 3.0, WTF?
January 23, 2010 at 6:48 pm
(This post was last modified: January 23, 2010 at 6:49 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
There is a technical position used in Australia which accurately describes that position; 'a load of hot cock'.
Another dickhead trying to put atheists as a group into neat little categories.That's like trying to dry a wet cat with a blow dryer. I uses that analogy because I tried it once; I stil have the scars. I kid you not.
'Atheism' means a disbelief in god(s) period.
Some atheists,such as Dawkins and Hitchens are anti religion in principle,but not necessarily antitheist.(the two are not the same thing)
I am neither anti religion nor anti theist in principle,although I consider organised religion to be parasitic an often dangerous.
'As an atheist', my views a far from universal,and I'm fine with that.They are neither implied nor inferred from the fact of my atheism.
Another dickhead trying to put atheists as a group into neat little categories.That's like trying to dry a wet cat with a blow dryer. I uses that analogy because I tried it once; I stil have the scars. I kid you not.
'Atheism' means a disbelief in god(s) period.
Some atheists,such as Dawkins and Hitchens are anti religion in principle,but not necessarily antitheist.(the two are not the same thing)
I am neither anti religion nor anti theist in principle,although I consider organised religion to be parasitic an often dangerous.
'As an atheist', my views a far from universal,and I'm fine with that.They are neither implied nor inferred from the fact of my atheism.
