I'm a YEC. Challenge me.

[Aractus]

---

I am a Young Earth Creationist on a quest: I am sincerely interested in reading EVERY argument against YEC.

Brief background: After studying creationism, I was encouraged to see how strong this model has become over the recent decade.
It caused me to want to search out and read arguments AGAINST creation. And the more I read them, the more convinced I became: the creation model is actually very logically solid.

But just to make sure I’ve done a thorough search, I decided to come here and ask members of an atheist forum. I’ve certainly done plenty of searching myself, googling, bing-ing, etc. I’m pretty sure I’ve read all of them, but perhaps you know of some more.
Here’s links to the ‘best’ ones I’ve found (I not included the lesser quality ones):
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Branches_of...reationism
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_ag...t_creation
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4065
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Problems_wi..._inerrancy
http://www.skepticreport.com/sr/?cat=16
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-flood.html
http://www.skepticreport.com/sr/?p=499
http://www.scientificamerican.com/articl...reationist (As a YEC, I particularly enjoyed this one)

So, if you have any other good ones, please post them here and I will read them.

**REQUEST: PLEASE keep this thread on topic: posting challenges to YEC.
I am not interested in starting a debate, nor defending myself. I REALLY do want good information in response, from credible sources when possible (not just random thoughts).

(Fellow creationists: please don’t jump in and ramble, just listen. In fact, if you do that same research I’ve done, you might too come out very encouraged by what you believe)

-Jeff

---

So I see that you have not specifically said what you are arguing against. It's easy to argue against a single thing that we know is wrong, for instance I will emphatically agree with you that Darwinism is wrong and doesn't address the true mechanics of evolution even at a rudimentary level, however, that doesn't mean that evolution itself doesn't take place.

Now I will say that theory of the big bang is also wrong, and I've said this many times. It cannot account for the creation of time, it can only account for the creation of matter within "space-time"; and there are other ways to view the universe. If you already have time, then you can have a universe self-create by the laws of physics. But even that is purely theoretical, and only an idiot - or someone as infatuated as Einstein was in his own worldview - would take it as "gospel truth".

Do you read the Bible and conclude that Pi is equal to 3? Of course not. Just because it uses a figure that may not be "exact" doesn't mean that it's wrong, and if it is then you can write out the exact decimal amount of Pi?

Why do humans share ANY DNA with mice do you think?