RE: Scientific method proves order cannot exist w/o intelligence
January 28, 2010 at 6:11 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2010 at 6:12 pm by Welsh cake.)
(January 5, 2010 at 10:22 am)scientist Wrote: I've been in major debates against atheists and time and time again, the fundamental flaws of atheism lead to their consistent defeat. This is expected because atheism's flaws are basic, fundamental in nature and cannot stand against good theist attacks.Pray tell. You obviously couldn't have had that many debates since Atheism is the rejection of Theistic claims, for sake of argument it assumes the null hypothesis i.e. the default position is disbelief until said claim is proven true. Simply stating that "I have a lack of a belief in God and/or Gods" because you have never been presented with a single good reason to believe in such concepts has no fundamental flaws.
Quote:By the scientific method, we can conclude that inorganic objects are incapable of producing order of any kind without an intellgence/intelligent being guiding them.Kindly define "order" or at least explain in what context you are using that term please.
Quote:Only intelligent beings, controlling inorganic objects can make these objects arrange into order as the scientific method proves.Nonsense. Chemical bonding for instance, is an interaction between atoms or molecules which allows the formation of polyatomic chemical compounds, this is a natural ongoing process, and it does not require biological faculties of cognitive process (thought) to make it so. Besides the interaction of arranging inanimate objects together to organise or categorise them is an arbitrary labour, a concept, and certainly not taken as objective truth.