(October 24, 2013 at 1:30 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 23, 2013 at 7:56 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Then he failed to satisfy the criteria I spent that sentence describing.
So if the President or Queen or whomever runs your country sends a messenger to you to start a dialog that would eventually lead into a face to face, you would not respond?
A big difference here is that for Obama's case, the messenger, or the messenger's messenger would have actually seen and spoken to Obama. Plus, actually getting a message from Obama would not break any physics laws and would not be unexpected in our experience in reality.
(October 24, 2013 at 1:30 pm)Drich Wrote:Unless the messengers just made it all up, which is, of course, what we are all contending. Your logic is such a huge fail.(October 23, 2013 at 8:09 pm)Brakeman Wrote: What if you quit making excuses for an absent god?The act of sending a messenger denotes a present and active God.
Find the cure for Fundementia!