RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 26, 2013 at 12:55 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2013 at 12:57 am by Polaris.)
(October 26, 2013 at 12:48 am)Esquilax Wrote:(October 26, 2013 at 12:09 am)Polaris Wrote: Courtois, Stéphane ed.. (1999). The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression.
So, you bring to the table a book criticized for historical inaccuracy, borked casualty figures, and one sided argumentation, whose editor specifically lays the blame at the feet of communist regimes and not atheism?
Interesting...
I think it's pretty obvious the only fools who mentioned atheism as a cause were those who like to claim they are atheists. I can see why Christians like to claim the No True Scotsman fallacy. If this is the best of of what atheists can offer, religion will be strong by 2050.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
