Cooking was very much advanced by science. Having so much information at our disposal about spices and culinary complementing, plus having a much more readily-accessible cornucopia of fruits, vegetables, spices, herbs, sauces, livestock, and fish has very much been advanced by science. Music, the same; there's quite a lot more genres and forms of music and means of recording, producing, and playing them thanks to scientific advancement. Art, the same; digital artwork, photography, production, cinema, artistic tools and mediums in general have become greatly advanced thanks to scientific advancement. Love, not quite so much, but it certainly helps that we scientifically understand the biology of genders, the psychology of individuals, and there are now many more means of meeting others whom you might fall in love with thanks to the internet, for example. Philosophy and religion? Well, religion is the antithesis of science anyway; science is empiricism. Religion is foundationalism. Philosophical opposites.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 26, 2025, 6:18 am
Poll: Is science the only way to knowledge? This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes | 18 | 41.86% | |
No | 25 | 58.14% | |
Total | 43 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Is science the only way to knowledge?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)