RE: Is killing a witch always a bad thing?
October 27, 2013 at 9:01 pm
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2013 at 9:05 pm by Mystical.)
Lemme guess, Salem Witch trials?
If someone wants my blood or hair, have at it. I'd poke a finger and give it, cut my hair and give it. They're stupid.
But my dog.. Oh man. I dare you to enter my property with a shotgun in my hand and a knife in my boot.
What would I do 300yrs ago? MOVE AWAY. But only after I burned down their house and all their witch stuff secretly (group justice is uncontrollable).
Then they'd have to move away.
If someone wants my blood or hair, have at it. I'd poke a finger and give it, cut my hair and give it. They're stupid.
But my dog.. Oh man. I dare you to enter my property with a shotgun in my hand and a knife in my boot.
What would I do 300yrs ago? MOVE AWAY. But only after I burned down their house and all their witch stuff secretly (group justice is uncontrollable).
Then they'd have to move away.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.