RE: Yet more fine christian skewed priorities
November 11, 2013 at 7:27 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2013 at 7:30 pm by catfish.)
(November 11, 2013 at 7:20 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Catfish would rather reinterpret the motivations of people he's never even met, than debate the topic at hand.
And see, I knew this would happen, because it's the exact same argument that was used the last time this happened: if you can't excuse the behavior of your own side, the christian response seems to just get aggressive and try to smear everyone else, as though dragging others down to their level excuses the behavior of their own side.
King strawman to the rescue!
(November 11, 2013 at 7:27 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(November 11, 2013 at 7:14 pm)catfish Wrote: Oh, you spoke to them?
I didn't need to. The Christians ended the arrangement.
You made a claim : "If the atheist organization cared more about eradicating Christianity, they would have made the break."
You claimed to know their motivations of why they didn't make the break. It would seem more advantageous for the dissenter(s) to work from within, not from without. Your reasoning seems dumb.
