(November 11, 2013 at 7:27 pm)catfish Wrote: You made a claim : "If the atheist organization cared more about eradicating Christianity, they would have made the break."
You claimed to know their motivations of why they didn't make the break. It would seem more advantageous for the dissenter(s) to work from within, not from without. Your reasoning seems dumb.
Unless you know that the atheist organization was actually entertaining the idea of making a break, what's dumb is trying to assign reasons why the group didn't do something they had no apparent intention of doing in the first place. Neither did the Christian organization accuse the atheists of being undercover proselytizers. They simply told them to fuck off and refused to explain why.
Who's claiming to know motivations, now?
