The problem is that your question presupposes (with no justification) that the God of scripture is to be given preference when considering possible evidence for the existence of a deity. This is silly. In fact, if all the philosophical and scientiific arguments for God's existence were valid, sound and incontestable, they would be far more suitable for inferring the existence of a Deistic god, as there is no possible argument to makke the philosophical arguments support any single god in particular and it alone.
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
-George Carlin
