(November 27, 2013 at 12:20 pm)apophenia Wrote:Wow alpo, did you really have to go back a whole year to find my last mistake? I guess I am doing pretty well if you had to go back that far to rehash something so you could construct a valid arguement with.(November 27, 2013 at 10:53 am)Drich Wrote: What man deems 'immoral' or moral is all based off of works. In God's righteousness the acts themselves have no meaning, it is what we do in relation to a given command/act that places us in or outside of God's expressed will/righteousness.
And you know this how? Your book saying something is so doesn't make it so, even if it weren't bloody fucking ambiguous in the bible. And no, I don't depend on our little fourth grade reader to interpret the text for us. You showed at Christmas last year with your inept and incompetent attempt to defend a bollocksed up interpretation of bohu (here) that you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to interpreting ANY text, much less a holy text. I worship She who destroys, and she shows me that all your words are Maya. Prove my god wrong. I dare you.
That said, I am not here to 'prove your god(s) wrong.' I am here to answer Questions and provide clarity who seek the God of the bible. My primary job is to help those of you who have not made a desision about the God of the bible, to make an informed choice. What you choose for yourself is truly none of my concern. Which means if you wish to worship a picture of your cat as God, then who am I to say your wrong? God has seen fit to give you the right to choose whatever you wish to believe what makes you think I care what you choosen for yourself? Again my presents here is to provide clarity concerning the God of the bible for those who seek it. Not argue with those who have their hearts set on someother 'god.'
