RE: Man's morality
November 27, 2013 at 3:12 pm
(This post was last modified: November 27, 2013 at 3:16 pm by Drich.)
(November 27, 2013 at 2:52 pm)tokutter Wrote: So you pitched your tent of god answers in an atheist campsite because people who CHOSE to visit an atheist website are choosing to find god.Not all, but some. I am here for the one or two of you who don't believe because christianity as you understand it simply does not make sense, and have questions that organized religion have deem blasphmous or too hertical to answer.
Quote: YOU ARE ONE BIG WALKING TALKIN CONTRADICTION DRICH......but what would one expect from a bible connoisseur.What I do may seem contradictory if you assume I am here with the same goals as typical bible teacher.
Quote:Your here to try and be one of the bestest slimiest christian apologists you can be.....which won't be much.It happens way more than I like, but at the same time if her best revelant example was a year ago, an honest person would seriously question how well she is really doing.
Oh and by the bye....Apophenia handed you your ass for a hat in that thread she linked.
Aprophenia..............your my HERO.
.
I am almost at 4000 posts in about 2 years time, and in everything that was said in all of that time 1 revelant instance comes up? It's not like I post like Minnie does where the bulk of what I say are one liners or personal insults. Most of my work goes in depth to what is being discussed, and it is rare that i do not go line by line to disassemble and answer each point of contention. In all of that alpo brings up one point.
If that's the case then know alpo, your my hero too.
(November 27, 2013 at 2:57 pm)Godlesspanther Wrote:(November 27, 2013 at 2:49 pm)Drich Wrote: You guys really do not understand or simply do not know how to approach or argue what I am saying do you?
In the Righteousness God offers us through attonement, we are no longer bound by our works to define our 'morality.' Which make your whole arguement invalid.
Do you want to try again, or conceed that 'we' have the better deal?
No -- I understand that construct and how it is intended to function. I'ts not that I don't "get it" -- it's just that it's wrong. You magical goo-goo-fuck in the sky is imaginary. Your stupid book is a pile of shit and hold no weight in contemporary society.
I fully comprehend your system. In a nutshell -- pray to Skweezuz or go to hell. It's just wrong and too stupid to be taken seriously.
Case closed.
Ah... And now we know how many licks it take to get to the center of the Godless p's toosie pop. It's like this crap is preprogramed into all of you, it's just some of you will hold out and discuss the topic a little longer than others, but in the end you all default to name calling and move to dismiss what you can not refute. Maybe next time.
