(November 30, 2013 at 9:12 pm)Chas Wrote:(November 30, 2013 at 8:23 pm)apophenia Wrote:
It invalidates the duty, not God's righteousness. Can you tell the difference between large objects?
Out of curiosity, what is this a response to?
(November 30, 2013 at 2:44 pm)Drich Wrote: Again A judgement day defense strageity starts by somehow invalidating God's Righteousness, and substitute your own self righteousness/morality for it. Then issue the challenge to convict the 'moral being' based on the defining qualities of your own personal version of righteousness/morality.(emphasis added)
Kan't does this in your opening line. "A duty incapable of being fulfilled is not a duty at all." Clearly for you, This invalidates God's Righteousness. ... Again this is a perfect example of a judgement day defense strageity. No amount of wishing want or calling me 4th grader will ever change that.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)