(December 2, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Godlesspanther Wrote: Either you have no concept of these logical fallacies or how they work or you are just playing dumb. I suspect the latter.
If you need a refresher:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/
http://www.theskepticsguide.org/resource...Fresources
Yes, it would be good to look up a logical fallacy to get an idea as to how to apply it correctly. None of the logical fallacies that you have accused me of match up to what i was actually saying.
You have access to internet search engines just as much as I do. You are without excuse.
I think you'll find it a fair characterization that he simply doesn't understand them. He's a proof-texter, not an apologist or philosopher. His notion of whether a fallacy is committed is if the words used in the Wikipedia description of the fallacy, and the words used in the person's rhetoric, are similar. He has no concept of logical structure whatsoever.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)