Man's morality

[Drich]

Maybe you guys should just out right move to Personal attacks like alpo did. Because rehashing a defeated arguement is getting you no where. She seems to be one of the best and brightest amongest you, so maybe you should take her que and forgo the attempt for a topical discussion, and simply try and personally destroy the messenger, rather than validate a message (by responding to it) that makes you all look like hypocritical monsters. It's a page taken from the political commentators book of spinning a loosing battle. Do not address the question ask, address the question you wished they asked, if all else fails trivialize the indivisual and dismiss the attempt.

There is only one or two people on this website that can see the desperation in this act, so for the most part you will be considered a hero on the level of a John stewart, or a Bill Mahar by your peers. Then you and 'they' can declare a victory.

This is where we are supposed to apologize for pointing out that a ridiculous idea is ridiculous. Is stating the obvious really that insulting?

Actually none of you has done this yet. Most of you have tried by saying God killed unborn babies by the thousands. Then i pointed out in your 'morality' You/Your perfered liberal soceity kills millions of these babies every year. You point out God kills an entire people, then i point out we did or currently doing our best to do the same with the taliban, again all of this while protected under the flag of morality. The acts don't change only the P/C term justifying the act changes and this soceity licenses itself to do 100x's more evil than what God has done.

What is insulting is that you johnny come latlys' think your the first person to come up with the very same arguement that the previous 10 was about.

That is why i suggested that you simply give up your current arguement. Because if your arguement spouted by a peer did not work on page 1-9 what makes you think it would work on page 10? Then I directed your attention to what Alpo was doing. I said because she is way smarter than you, maybe you should follow her on her approach, and that is to attack me personally, rather than try and address a topic that i am beating all of you in. She knows it is a lost cause that is why she is trying to kill the message by attacking the messenger first.

Are you so dense as to not understand all of this?

Maybe you should go back and read where your peers have failed and left the conversation, then maybe change your failed approach to something that works.