(December 4, 2013 at 8:27 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Several types of marriage law unfairly discriminate against people who just want to "get married".
*consanguinity
*citizenship/visa requirements
*committed intent/fidelity
*age
*cooling off period (advance notice)
*gender stipulations
*bigamy prohibitions
*zoophilia prohibitions
Why do the Equal Love activists demand that people have to love each other in order to meet the threshold? They are in effect, discriminating against people who want to get married for a whole host of other reasons.
There's a stigma attached to bestiality. But if a man and his goat 'wife' were able to hold up a "Legally Married" certificate, it would help break down those disgusting social barriers of bigotry and intolerance.
Croatians vote to ban gay marriage.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/de...referendum
Why is it that so many theists can't understand the term "consenting adults"?
I know among certain sections of the religious community that choirboys are the in thing (or should that be 'things in choirboys"?) but they're not consenting adults, either.
To answer this question myself, I'm unsure about close blood relatives getting sexually involved. I'm kinda on the fence about it. But, then again, who am I to deny happiness to two consenting adults when it doesn't affect me.
On a lighter note, to quote the late Mel Smith: "If god had not meant man to make love to animals why did he put horns on the front of the goat to hang on to? And why do zebras look like they're wearing pyjamas?"
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
