Two consenting adults, including relatives?

[Lion IRC]

It's about marriage.

It's about you trying to dishonestly imply that we're hypocrites because we believe in any kind of restrictions on who can marry what.

---

What about teenagers?
If gay teens in schools ought to be allowed to freely express their 'born-that-way' sexual preferences, then why can't they give consent to have sex... err... I mean express their Equal Love... err... I mean get legally married so people will stop discriminating against them?

Case in point.

I'm not calling anyone that horrible name 'hypocrite'
...yet.

But I will if I start getting a whiff of that stench called... having a double standard, especially when you can't seem to explain why animals can't give consent (as if its even needed in a world full of abattoirs and caged animals)

---

Why exactly does the (adult) gay rights lobby pursue their 'tolerance' agenda in the Boy Scouts? In schools? On kids TV shows like Glee?

Gay kids should come out of the closet.
And do what?

---

We all know homosexuality is a hot topic. Many people agree with homosexual marriage under the idea that adults should be able to do what they want, as long as everything is consentual.

Should we include relatives under that as well. Most people are against brothers and sisters making love because it's inbreeding, but not all marriages are for making babies. Does anyone think it will come to that?

I guess the topic of polygamy could come up too, which many christians are against for some odd reason. Most people who were married in the bible were polygamists, after all.

If I had posted this I would get done for trolling a slippery slope homophobic agenda.
Well done Chad32!
The Op exposes one small part of a great big elephant sitting right there in the middle of the room.
Namely, how are lawyers and judges going to stop this whole definition of marriage thing from unraveling.