(December 9, 2013 at 6:39 pm)Godschild Wrote:(December 8, 2013 at 6:29 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: Maybe he found the true god undiluted by the men who wrote the bible. Maybe he doesn't think the one and true god would go bashing babies heads on rocks. Maybe he has reckoned the attributes a god of such magnitutde as to be the Creator of the universe, are far more pure than that which has been described by the Bible.
As for what you said to me --sorry for butting in there--I'll do some more research and look at Strongs Concordance definitions. I'm not saying god would disown his own wife, I'm saying the evidence I've seen suggests that the Biblical god seems to be intertwined with a whole lot of others, and that this particular one may have just been the victor--thus the need for revisions and evidence for such.
The Bible is where one can find the true God, the Bible isn't contaminated. The only place you will find the Biblical God intertwined with other gods is out side the Bible, plenty of that stuff in historical accounts. Missluckie26, if you knew me as those here where I live you would know I'm not on to be lead around by the nose. I question much even my pastor at times, I seek truth not what people want me to believe.
GC
No, the bible is where YOU want the one true god to be. So the fuck what. Muslims think the Koran is the divine book inspired by their god.
Get in line take a number, self serving circular reasoning doesn't impress us in the least.
Quote:I seek truth not what people want me to believe.
No, you seek excuses to cling to your position. Real quality control isn't about apology, real quality control is kicking the shit out of a claim, then having others kick the shit out of the claim.
Your "truth" is the same bad reasoning skill that leads others to believe in their gods as well, "It feels right", "I want it to be true".
Oh and the bible IS contaminated on every page, with scientifically absurd claims, and outright moral repugnance lead by a bloodthirsty dictator god.
