(December 10, 2013 at 12:23 pm)Kiko Wrote:(December 10, 2013 at 12:08 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Slut is a bit negative because it's a lifestyle choice which can be dangerous because of STD's and unwanted pregnancies.
I don't know, I don't think that when a man calls a woman a slut, or even when a woman calls another woman a slut, I don't think it really has anything to do with STDs and such. I think it's more to do with the fact that promiscuous women are seen as less worthy as a potential partner (as opposed to worthy as a person - I don't that's the implication at all), the implication being that she loses a certain innocence or something like that, and that being promiscuous, for a woman at least, is seen as decreasing the likelihood of her being loyal. I read somewhere that a woman's ability to bond is closely linked to sex, as opposed to men, who can have sex with loads of people and not be affected in the same way. I think oxytocin has something to do with it, or so I read.
But either way, even if being promiscuous (a slut) does lessen a woman's ability to bond, and even it does lessen her ability to be loyal, and even if she does lose a certain innocence, I can't understand how that's any reason to see her as not being a good potential long term partner and that's why the word ought to be reclaimed, to make the point that women can make the same lifestyle choices as men without having to face being shamed for it.
Maybe it's all just human nature, or maybe it's gender norms (whether or not those norms arise as a result of human nature), but there are clearly biases which need to be challenged. I do realize that animals have certain set male / female behaviours which are beneficial to their species as a whole, but we're a step above animals, and we have the ability and the right to make whatever lifestyle choices we want, and to make mistakes too.
Based on what you have said I'd the negativity of being a slut would be based on the negative aspects of being disloyal, with less ability to bond and to lose innocence (whatever that is).
This argument is like something in alice in wonderland to me,
you can't see why a slut (promiscuous women) would be a see as any less of a good long term partner?
It depends if someone is looking for a long term fuck buddy or looking for a relationship with commitment, by definition I would have thought slut means a person with a severe lack of commitment to a relationship.
I personally think we are animals so therefore not a step above them, humans are classed in the great ape family and our mating habits are slightly similar to other apes, I've seen documentaries with female apes going behind the dominant males back and having sex with less dominant males based on communication with sneaky facial expressions.
Sluttiness in the animal kingdom is beneficial at times because it increases competition between sperm and the sexual partners themselves and probably has something to do with the evolution of our subtle facial expressions and communications.
I think people should be free to live how they want to live but if people don't like the live style choice of slutty behavior and frown upon people who do it then that's also their choice.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.