(December 10, 2013 at 7:27 pm)ThomM Wrote: Well - how about Bashing the heads of the infants of the Amaleks against rocks and being happy about it?Honestly, don't care what happened to babies that live/died 4500 years ago. Now are you happy about the right a woman has to choose over the life and death of her unborn child now?
How selfrighteous does one have to be to feign concern about a child that lived 4500 years ago, and not be concerned for the literal 1.3 billion who have been slaughtered since just 1980, for the perservation of a woman's current or projected life style?
Quote:How about stoning to death a child that does not obey?Again don't care, not my religion. Not anyone's religion for the past 2000 years. What about partial birth abortion? where a viable baby is ripped out of the mother (all except the head) then scisors are inserted at the base of the skull, the brains scrambled and then sucked out to deflate the head? The child's only crime? the mother's situation changed late term, and she did not want to go through birth and the adoption process.
Quote:How about Murdering the entire first born of Egypt for something their Pharaoh did - that they had NO control over?

Quote:How about murdering ALL the innocent infant and babies of the world in a great flood - because their parents did not obey him?How many 'babies' do you think were alive durning the great flood?
Campare that to the10's of Millions the US has murdered (billion+ world wide) we have slaughtered since 1980. This is what I am talking about when I say blinders
At best you sound out of touch or uninformed. If however you are aware of Abortion that would make you a self righteous hypocrite. Otherwise why concern yourself with the death of babies in a flood you do not even think happened, when literally a billion+ babies have been put to death under your generation's watch? Why aren't you concerned with the here and now, but show concern for the same subject in a story you do not even think to be real??
http://www.numberofabortions.com/
Quote:THe problem is that if you ask an xtian - they will only point to the particular passages they want to quote from - and ignore that the god of the bible is a viscous amoral beingIf God is a monster for killing hundreds maybe thousands, then what does it make you for supporting the legislation that has killed a billion+ in just 30 years?
After 17 pages of dialog with your peers, do you honestly think your the first to bring up the order for the death of a very specific group of babies by God??
Your peers have all fallen in their attempts to show God to be evil because of these deaths, why? Because they have sense enough to see whatever blood maybe on the Hands of God, is nothing to the sea of blood we have supported and created in the name perserving a life style.
Their own hyprocrisy or fear of exposure to it has ended their arguements. Now the question remains. will you embrace your hyprocrisy, or renounce a 'woman's right to choose,' and be jeered by your peers inorder to try and capture the moral high ground against God?.
