RE: Man's morality
December 11, 2013 at 11:48 am
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2013 at 11:58 am by Drich.)
(December 11, 2013 at 11:40 am)Esquilax Wrote: Looks like somebody has never heard of dreaming!So you believe your conscious during the REM cycle?
Quote:Oh wait, you were just being obtuse and dishonest by pretending not to know the difference between a clump of cells and a sleeping person, weren't you? I forgot whose post I was reading for a second there.
Your speaking beyond the parameters of the discussion. The only qualifier the noob put in his arguement was a need for consciousness. Otherwise a woman's rights superceed the rights of the unconscious.
(December 11, 2013 at 11:46 am)Esquilax Wrote: One wonders whether Drich is also against government aid for unwed mothers, sex education, and birth control, especially the kind covered by health insurance.I do not care what a person's health care covers, so long as I am not asked to pay for it. The moment I am asked to pay for something I should have some say on how the money is spent.
Quote:I mean, he's already admitted that if these "billions" of abortions had happened a thousand years ago he wouldn't care about them, so he can't put that much importance on these poor, poor children...Do you not see the malevolent hyprocrisy it takes to make a statement like this? 1.3 billion babies have been murdered with in your life time, and millions more this year and every year from now till people like you decide to wake up, and honestly look at what your doing putting the propaganda aside.
How can you or anyone else feign concern with a straight face over something that happened 4000 years ago, when you are not willing to something about this very same act occouring with in your life time?
Doing something to stop the killing now, puts you in a position to condemn the acts that happened 4000 years ago. Ignoring what happens now makes you a foolish hypocrite when you pretend to care what happened durning a flood you do not even believe happened.
