Man's morality

[Drich]

No, but your mind is still functioning, and your subconscious is active, two things that a pre-life clump of cells does not have.

If left to develop would it? Your "lump of goo" is still human, it's just in a earily stage of development.

Your speaking beyond the parameters of the discussion. The only qualifier the noob put in his arguement was a need for consciousness. Otherwise a woman's rights superceed the rights of the unconscious.

Ahh, so you're just being unpleasantly literal in the hopes of staving off being incorrect for a few more posts while other users correct misunderstandings that you're purposely committing in some form of argument blockade. No less dishonest, in the end.

There is nothing dishonest in what i have observed. I simply refused to look at the situation through the rose colored glasses i was being offered..

What does it say about an arguement that will not hold up to any level of scrutiny? It says it is an invalid arguement.

That's not how taxes work, though. How like a christian to demand special exemptions whenever it suits them, though. What disgusting privilege.

Actually it is in the US. If we do not like how our taxes are spent we ELECT new leaders.

Because, no matter how much emotive language you throw into the mix, as though appeals to emotion mean anything, I don't think fetuses are alive,

Because you unquestionably believe the propaganda.

nor do I think you get to define them as such through fiat declaration.

Your right nothing I can say will do this, but in page 1or 2 I posted a video of a sonigram of a baby screaming and reacting to pain while being aborted, This video and this baby does indeed establish the viablity or rather a fetus is indeed alive.

Moreover, I don't think the stories in the bible are true either, just indicative of the cognitive dissonance one such as you must indulge in, sacrificing any hope at a consistent moral framework in order to burble hysterically about abortions, despite worshiping a god that's like the biggest abortionist on the planet, according to your theology.

how so?
What is my theory?
Is 'my theory' based on the same scrutiny you lambasted me for in the start of this post? Are you 'being unpleasantly literal in the hopes of staving off being incorrect for a few more posts while other users correct misunderstandings that you're purposely committing in some form of argument blockade?'

Doing something to stop the killing now, puts you in a position to condemn the acts that happened 4000 years ago. Ignoring what happens now makes you a foolish hypocrite when you pretend to care what happened durning a flood you do not even believe happened.

I could just refuse your ridiculous framing of a bunch of cells as life, and avoid your false dichotomy entirely. Oh look! I'm already doing that!

with what wishful thinking? Your word?

---

I do not care what a person's health care covers, so long as I am not asked to pay for it. The moment I am asked to pay for something I should have some say on how the money is spent.

So the women should be coerced into having children, then left to their own devices to raise the child. If you really gave a shit about the children you would want them to be raised in a economically stable home. Or do they stop mattering after they are born?

Do you not have adoption in your country? In the US we are so appearently in need of babies to adopt we are importing them.