(December 13, 2013 at 8:01 pm)Nineteen Wrote:NO IT DID NOT! Get your fucking head out of your ass.(December 13, 2013 at 6:06 pm)Brian37 Wrote: No, Hindus if they had a word for "atom" it meant the same fucking thing as the Greeks, REALLY REALLY REALLY SMALL THING. But neither would have had knowledge of nucleus or protons or electrons. Don't be an idiot and claim any ancient myth club had any working knowledge of modern science.
But since you make that argument that the Hindus used the word first then Vishnu must be a real god and you should worship that god.
Science is not dependent on ALLAH or Vishnu or Jesus or Thor, you know it and you are just too deluded to accept it.
Not to mention sapients were fucking and reproducing long before Islam, Christianity, Roman/Greek Polythiesm/Hinduism ect ect ect.
Holy books are NOT science textbooks, not yours not any.
I say again , Greeks or Hindus talks about "atom" as the smallest parts of substances . They are located in such a prediction , just a guess . Quran directly talks about the "atom" and more smaller things than atom . Not a prediction , an information .
Be careful while you talking with me and choose the right words away from rudeness .
Yes I will be rude. No one put a gun to your head and forced you to post this tripe. The fact that we are not buying it is your problem, not ours.
You are NOT doing anything differently people of other religions do. You got stuck on Islam and fallaciously want it to match science AFTER THE FACT.
Christians and Jews have pulled the same "science matches my book" crap you are trying to pull here.
IT DOES NOT FUCKING WORK.
EVIDENCE IS NOT RELIGION BASED PERIOD! It will not prop up ALLAH or Jesus or Thor.
You might as well be arguing Harry Potter explains aeronautics because he flies around on a broom.