(December 16, 2013 at 2:32 am)rasetsu Wrote:
Meh. It's irritating, but traditional responses to apologetics don't appear especially effective against it, either. Not sure what to make of that fact.
I'm of the opinion that a weak reductio ad absurdum can be constructed on the foundation of presuppositionalism.
(Assuming god -> logic + reason -> most probable explanation = no God -> assumed (God) + inference from assumption (is no God) == contradiction; therefore, assumption ( is God ) == not true.)
I've seen attempts at something like that, and IIRC the response was something like "Since you presuppose the truth of my worldview in even using reasoning, clearly your applications of it is what is wrong."
I think the best refutation I've heard was by this YT user called KnownNoMore. Here's one such video:
"Presuppositional Apologetics Refuted Part 3":
Also, why do you always end your post with empty bold tags? xD
