RE: Islam IS the true religion of humanity.
December 17, 2013 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2013 at 10:31 am by Duck.)
(December 17, 2013 at 10:19 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote:(December 17, 2013 at 10:10 am)Ksa Wrote: Since you linked Gauss' curve, you see the 3 sigma(standard deviations) at right/left. According to the data I posted, the probability for homosexuality to be un-natural is 3 standard deviations away meaning in the 0.1% region so multiplied by 2 that's 0.2% chance for it to be an un-natural occurrence and over 99.8% chance for it to be of natural causes.
Nine sticks to that 0.2% chance because religion makes her feel good.
Indeed.(although I'm not convinced that one can determine causality from a distribution). However I'm thinking that when 19 says natural she does not mean it in the mathmatical sense. I certainly did not start to learn about gaussian distribution until I was at post grad level so I'm not holding that against her. However it does mean I don't really know what normal means to her.
That's why I'm interested.
I think we are wandering onto slightly dangerous ground here. I also feel people may start confusing normal with a normally-distributed data set. Hardly synonymous and the word normal doesn't mean the same in the two contexts.
I think Nineteen needs to define what she means by 'normal' before we can continue in even a vaguely meaningful fashion.
Nineteen? Can you do so please?
Oh, and I think Ksa is abusing statistics slightly too; chance isn't really the right word to use, it is more accurate to talk about the variation in the data being random or not.



(although I'm not convinced that one can determine causality from a distribution). However I'm thinking that when 19 says natural she does not mean it in the mathmatical sense. I certainly did not start to learn about gaussian distribution until I was at post grad level so I'm not holding that against her. However it does mean I don't really know what normal means