(February 18, 2010 at 3:25 pm)tavarish Wrote: I think someone just gave him a really crappy argument that made no sense.It's like the opposite of the Christ taking the sins of humanity thing. We all get punished everytime a crackpot makes a bad argument.
When you argue against the institution of Captial-A Athiesm and it's absurd subjective morality doctrine, one can assume you argue from the position of a theistic worldview in which morality is something arbitrarily prescribed by your choice deity and applied to humanity as some sort of vast set of rules. Aren't these subjective relative to your deity?
Could you clarify your stance on morality?
- Meatball


