Worst atheistic argument?

[objectivitees]

[quote='tavarish' pid='56735' dateline='1266531229']1. In that same respect, I shall call you a Athorist, since I'm sure you don't beieve in the God Thor. Apparently this non-belief constitutes a worldview. Tell me, Athorist, how can you account for the lack of moral absolutes? Hmmmm?

I'm sorry, you think a "non-belief" constitutes a worldview, when worldviews deal with beliefs?

I know in my atheism I pray to not-god all the time and I live my life according to the un-bible. Seriously man, wtf.

WTF? that's the same reaction I had to your equivocation.

Here's a definition of worldview:
[i]
A comprehensive world view (or worldview) is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing natural philosophy, fundamental existential and normative postulates or themes, values, emotions, and ethics.

Wow, wikipedia huh? That's some real deep research man. Any way, fine, I'll accept that definition because it covers the basics. Worldviews are comprised of a "metaphysic", an "epistemology" and an "ethic".

So what can you deduce about my values, emotions and ethics as they are applied to my stance on various philosophical topics and themes?

My non-belief apparently screams at people.

Well, from what you've written so far, I can deduce that you don't have a working understanding of what the discipline of philosophy considers the concept of "moral" to mean, which strips you of an ability to truly understand that "morality" and "survival" are not the same thing.

2. I'm glad we can agree on that, Athorist (With a capital "A")

The label doesn't bother me, Atheist with a capitol "A". (Especially since Athorism can't actually be a worldview according to the very definiton you provided.