(January 1, 2014 at 9:05 pm)Aractus Wrote: Paul is a primary source as he knew the family and disciples of Jesus.
Thank you for proving that you have no idea what a primary source is
Quote:James is a primary source (brother of Jesus).
And again
Quote: Luke may be, we don't know. John and Peter are also primary sources - the only way you discount this is my disputing authorship, and to do that you need evidence, and that evidence is all internal NT textual criticism.
No. the Onus is on you to prove that they were the writers. Since I have not said that they weren't the writers only that there is insufficient proof I have nothing to prove.
Strangely I don;t think many here will see it that way[/quote]
Quote:Hey here's a clue fucknuckle, I seldom use the report feature - and I used it because you specifically stated that I had no right to be here as a Christian. Then, afterward you went and edited your post - after I had already replied and reported you - and removed those comments.
You really are delusional. odd that I have not received a single message from the moderators about it but I am 'in trouble' it seems.
Quote:Your prejudice is no different to racism. If you think it is, next time my boss is in ear shot I'll record his racism for you and prove that what he says about arabs/muslims, jews, chinks, wogs, jiggabos, yarpies (he hates all south africans actually not just the men) and indians is near word-for-word identical to what you say. I have to put up with his fucking bullshit hate-mongering prejudice all the time I'm not putting up with yours.
Ah you are an Australian. I have no interest in race. The subject is boring.
Quote: And one final thing: you have no right to come on here and tell me to leave because I'm a Christian.
No, I didn't do that. I want you to stay and wibble on about 'Scholars' and show your ignorance about 'primary evidence'