(January 3, 2014 at 10:11 am)Aractus Wrote: Again, that's off-topic. There is evidence - Gospel evidence. Beyond that, yes, there is no further evidence (except of course for the sudden spread of the early Christian church itself, and if Jesus didn't appear to them then we don't know what motivated them after he had died)
So if a religion spreads quickly then it must be true? islam seems to have spread pretty damned quickly
Quote:. Sceptical scholars would say the evidence is insufficient (but they'll still agree that he was baptized and that he called disciples and died on a cross).That scholar word again. 'Scholars' may agree to anything. Proper academics do not insist that the is overwhelming proof that jesus 'was baptised'.
Quote: You're not telling me anything I don't know, and you won't even discuss the on-topic discussion ... the evidence that Christ existed; not the evidence for each of the individual things he did or said.
Probably because you refuse to provide proof of his existence you just say 'the bible says so'