The dangers of faith

[Angrboda]

Even if I thought it possible you were referring to something other than John -- the context makes clear you weren't -- the passage you quoted only supports that there will be no subtractions from the law, not that there will be no additions to the law. So, this is an even worse failure from an exegetical standpoint. And I must say that I find your attempt at a revisionist, ad-hoc attempt to rewrite your way out of trouble to be all too depressingly typical of your "God-given" morality.

Really, if I make false statements in a book I'm writing, and it contradicts an original writing on the same subject by all means I've tried to subtract and add to the original, anyone with understanding knows this. So your little quip has no standing in this case.

GC

So in other words you've argued in a circle:

The book of Mormon is false because it's an addition --> additions aren't allowed because they subtract from the truth of the whole --> this subtracts from the truth of the whole because the book of Mormon is false --> it's false because ....

Very nice. Got any more gems, douche bag?