Sex and an omniscient God

[Esquilax]

Yeah but those Christians are wrong, obviously.

Come one Esq, you're usually more clued up on shit like this.

Figures. It just seems like Drich is throwing away the entire premise of Jesus, here. If he isn't sinless, than he must have sinned, and if he's sinned he's certainly not such a divine offering on the cross that he could take all of our sins onto himself. In that case, he'd actually escaped the punishment that, in christian logic, we was fully deserving of.

I mean, what the hell, Drich? If all sinners go to hell, and Jesus sinned, then why was he the exception that goes to heaven? And what made him so special that he can take all of our sins too? Doesn't it seem a little... unfair that he was essentially appealing to himself for forgiveness?

Please, tell me if I'm missing something here. This is just an extrapolation from your very vague initial posts.