Abiogenesis is the problem for me.
That first creature, however simple, had to be formed by chemical means. Whilst that is possible the question is - how did it reproduce?
For this first creature, uniquely, it would have to have been created one way but reproduce using an entirely different mechanism. There is no model in biology for this, and, obviously, no examples we can use.
It is too much of a stretch to say that BOTH initial creation AND reproduction could have happened through natural processes.
Therefore God.
That first creature, however simple, had to be formed by chemical means. Whilst that is possible the question is - how did it reproduce?
For this first creature, uniquely, it would have to have been created one way but reproduce using an entirely different mechanism. There is no model in biology for this, and, obviously, no examples we can use.
It is too much of a stretch to say that BOTH initial creation AND reproduction could have happened through natural processes.
Therefore God.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
