CHISTIANS PLEASE EXPLAIN

[Esquilax]

Hi, it is very obvious that Dawkins’ “wavering “ and suggestion that little green men seeded life of course suggests intelligent design. Even "an idiot" can see that.

So, I posted this to you about two weeks ago, so it's interesting that, even after reminding you of it earlier today, you're still persisting with this egregious lie that Dawkins has any belief in the concept of intelligent design:

A common quote mine, but not a true one: Dawkins suggested panspermia- your "little green men"- as a possible scenario that would involve a creator of life, not the one he actually subscribes to. That answer was later taken out of context by creationists in order to misrepresent his position as the one you've posited here. Here, read it from the horse's... blog. It's down the page a little ways.

Here's the link again. You have, literally, no excuse for not immediately retracting your lie, and ceasing the use of it in future.

To state that evolution is the only way to get complex life is a statement you cannot make as this is by far not proven and is actually contradicted by the second LAW of thermodynamics (entropy) and has never been circumvented if a system is left to itself – whether an open or closed system.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! Interestingly, this is another one of those claims I warned you off of, that are so fallacious they've been debunked for years. Why are you still using them? Why aren't you even looking at the actual research before you make these ridiculous, bullshit claims?

It can be argued that when additional energy gets into a system, it increases disorder rather than decreases it/create order.
Stating evolution as a fact, is interesting. According to my best information, species shows up “abruptly”, fully developed and hence the proposed hypotheses of punctuated equilibrium. “Eldredge and Gould proposed that the degree of gradualism commonly attributed to Charles Darwin is virtually nonexistent in the fossil record, and that stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.”

As has been shown previously, your "best information," is an idiot. Every claim you've made here has been thoroughly debunked, and this one? It's just not true, and you can go and look at the findings of mainstream biology and cladistics to see why that is. All of the evidence is on the side of evolution, and this claim you've made here is pure fantasy.

But I'll give you a chance: who are Eldredge and Gould? Like, do they have full names, and a reference for that quote you made, so I can look it up and see for myself?

So my friend, it seems that you are being led up the garden path. No disrespect, but even a superficial evaluation of research by honest researchers on both sides of the spectrum will easily convince you that evolution can by no means be described as fact – with even the very first step (abiogenesis) resting on nothing more than hypotheses. And you accept that.
Against that, I put to you in all honesty the infallibility of God’s Word. Have a great day!

Assertions without evidence: even a cursory glance at mainstream biology demonstrates that evolution is accepted, confirmed scientific fact. Actually, it's interesting that you'll state that an evaluation of the research would say otherwise, given that ninety seven percent of scientists accept evolution as true. More lies from you, it seems!

Also, without demonstrating the "god" part of god's word, let alone the infallible part, you're just talking out your ass. But then, that's hardly surprising, by now.