CHISTIANS PLEASE EXPLAIN

[Esquilax]

Of course they could be wrong, and I am 100% sure they are. What this however indicates is that they recognized that the fossil record has some serious explaining to do as it is inconsistent with slow transition - see lack of millions and millions of transitional fossils.

Except that this claim is completely and utterly incorrect. Here's a list of all the transitional fossils that you say there aren't, liar. Moreover, this is plenty given how rare the formation of fossils actually are.

All this just goes to show how little research you actually do before you form your conclusions, making everything you think ignorant by default. Actually learn shit before you decide what is and isn't wrong, and then maybe your opinion might have some heft.

By the way, any movement on the "who are Eldredge and Gould?" front? Because those last names... I could just say anything I want and attribute it to someone else, would that have any more credibility than what you've done? What matters is whether or not they're qualified to make that assessment; given that it's incorrect, they probably aren't.

Names and references, or stfu.