If I am reading this right, the essense of his argument is this : If physical laws determine everything, then 1 set of starting conditions will determine everything that happens in the future.
Even without going into determinism, you'd have to demonstrate that God exists and sets those starting conditons. It would also throws in problems with free will. If his argument is true, then you yourself cannot help being an Atheist as God has determined that you will be at the start of the universe.
Even without going into determinism, you'd have to demonstrate that God exists and sets those starting conditons. It would also throws in problems with free will. If his argument is true, then you yourself cannot help being an Atheist as God has determined that you will be at the start of the universe.