(February 8, 2014 at 10:57 am)khan4036 Wrote: The evidence m giving is what I experience and believe.
And nobody cares except you. Harsh, perhaps, but why should anyone else consider your personal testimony, let alone your beliefs, even remotely convincing without independent verification? In a word, the one which is to religionists as garlic is to vampires: evidence.
(February 8, 2014 at 10:57 am)khan4036 Wrote: That evidence might not be sufficient for you until you experience it yourself.
Then you already know it is useless as evidence. Would you eat horseshit simply because someone told you they once heard of a person who ate it every day of his life and thrived on it? Now you begin to appreciate why anecdotal evidence by itself is worthless.
(February 8, 2014 at 10:57 am)khan4036 Wrote: Orinthology , the bird science which you suggested was also developed after observing the birds closely. Aristotle in 350 BC in his Historia Animalium noted the habit of bird migration, moulting, egg laying and life spans and introduced and propagated several myths. Still , this science is poor and steadily advancing till they understand fully what the birds really say to each other.
What birds may 'say' to each other is irrelevant; how they behave as a species is all that matters.
(February 8, 2014 at 10:57 am)khan4036 Wrote: The Quran ( The Holy Book of Islam ) has mentioned that the birds praise God continually. Where has Orinthology explained this ?
That's your job. Basic burden of proof.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'