But evidence should be relatable to the proof. Mathmatical proofs with mathmatical justification, historical artifacts for archeological proof, etc. Consistantly I've seen a requirement for scientific justification for metaphysical proof. So while the quality of evidence is a factor in it's acceptance vis credibility, the proof should match the pudding.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
