(March 15, 2010 at 5:21 pm)tackattack Wrote: But evidence should be relatable to the proof. Mathmatical proofs with mathmatical justification, historical artifacts for archeological proof, etc. Consistantly I've seen a requirement for scientific justification for metaphysical proof. So while the quality of evidence is a factor in it's acceptance vis credibility, the proof should match the pudding.
I wholeheartedly agree.
When theists make claims about the origin of the universe, that's cosmology.
When theists make claims about the origin of life on earth, that's biology.
When theists make claims about the origin of the species, that's evolution.
When theists make claims about the the healing power of prayer, that's medical science.
More often than not, the particular actions of the Christian God are in the realm of testable, verifiable science.
