(February 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm)TaraJo Wrote: That kinda depends on what you consider a revolution. If we had a non-violent revolution where the people woke up, took back control of the government and the corporately owned media (which the plutocrats use to control our thoughts and keep us on their side), I'm all on board with that.
Fortunately, we've (still) got a system that allows for non-violent and legal revolution at the ballot box. This is why their gerrymandering and voter suppression is such a big concern.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
