Q: do you, Christian, claim that God exists, rather than you believe that he exists?

[Crossless2.0]

In other words, you don't have any evidence that doesn't require prior belief in order for it to be received as true. If you don't see the problem with that, you are truly lost.

I do not have any evidence that cannot be explained away by someone who is unwilling to accept it.

In other words, the evidence I have is of the sort that it can be explained away if it is presented to a person who does not want to accept it.

I hope you can see how this differs from what you have suggested I have said. I have mentioned nothing about "prior belief" at all.

So anyone who finds your evidence unpersuasive is simply unwilling to accept it? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the nature of the evidence? Sorry, but I call bullshit.