RE: Q: do you, Christian, claim that God exists, rather than you believe that he exists?
February 24, 2014 at 10:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2014 at 10:26 pm by discipulus.)
(February 24, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: So anyone who finds your evidence unpersuasive is simply unwilling to accept it? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the nature of the evidence? Sorry, but I call bullshit.
No. That is a non-sequitur.
It could be that the person is willing but that they have judged the evidence to be weak.
(February 24, 2014 at 10:21 pm)rasetsu Wrote:(February 24, 2014 at 10:11 pm)discipulus Wrote: I do not have any evidence that cannot be explained away by someone who is unwilling to accept it.
In other words, the evidence I have is of the sort that it can be explained away if it is presented to a person who does not want to accept it.
I hope you can see how this differs from what you have suggested I have said. I have mentioned nothing about "prior belief" at all.
Look up the word "belief."
Why?